Assembly Method Comparison
The following graphs show the comparisons between the assembly methods.
You can view a list of contigs assembled for any combination of data set and assembly program.
The following table contains a summary of the assembly methods used
|
|
simLC |
simMC |
simHC |
||||||
|
|
Phrap |
Arachne |
JAZZ |
Phrap |
Arachne |
JAZZ |
Phrap |
Arachne |
JAZZ |
|
Reads |
100628 |
100628 |
100546 |
125652 |
125652 |
125513 |
118064 |
118064 |
117890 |
|
Contigs(>1 reads) |
10320 |
1400 |
1953 |
12644 |
4692 |
5840 |
19236 |
558 |
1066 |
|
Homogeneous contigs |
9055 |
1333 |
1941 |
11026 |
4329 |
5282 |
16451 |
477 |
1012 |
|
Reads in contigs |
56843 |
33065 |
29390 |
82693 |
55022 |
39808 |
47338 |
2744 |
2832 |
|
Degree of assembly in contigs (%) |
56.49% |
32.86% |
29.23% |
65.81% |
43.79% |
31.71% |
40.10% |
2.32% |
2.40% |
|
Major contigs (≥10 reads) |
482 |
367 |
503 |
1980 |
1372 |
876 |
86 |
20 |
11 |
|
Homogeneous contigs |
287 |
330 |
502 |
1380 |
1133 |
605 |
5 |
18 |
9 |
|
Reads in major contigs |
30852 |
28060 |
24405 |
50267 |
39190 |
19719 |
1521 |
290 |
192 |
|
Degree of assembly |
30.66% |
27.88% |
24.28% |
40.00% |
31.19% |
15.71% |
1.29% |
0.25% |
0.16% |
The following graphs show the degree of chimerism for each of the contigs in a data set as assembled by a given program. For each data set, the first graph is coloured according to the assembly program used, the second according to the taxonomic level of chimerism.
Chimerism in the AMD sample by assembly program
Chimerism in the AMD sample by taxonomic level
Chimerism in the EBPR sample by assembly program
Chimerism in the EBPR sample by taxonomic level
Chimerism in the soil sample by assembly program
Chimerism in the soil sample by taxonomic level